Senate consideration of health are is continuing. We’ll be alerting you when amendments come up on which you need to voice your opinion.
Here are the latest developments with regard to Senators Specter and Casey
Senator Specter mounts strong defense of the public option
As reported by Politico, Senator Specter made a strong defense of the public option at a press conference earlier today to announce a “’tri-partisan’ amendment aimed at boosting cost savings in the Senate health care bill.”
Specter, who was not initially billed to attend, launched into a defense of the public option during his turn at the microphone.
“There has been wide misunderstanding about the public option,” Specter said. “It does not drive the private sector out, it is an option, it is another choice.”
Lieberman and Collins said that they would not support a public option and attacked it.
However
Specter didn’t let the issue drop.
“One comment in rebuttal, I think we have learned a lot from the Maine plan, we know what not to do. We are not going to adopt the Maine plan,” Specter said. “And when Sen. Lieberman talks about single payer, I think he is putting his finger on the pulse of it, that is what people are confusing the public option with, it isn’t a single payer, and it is not going to add to the deficit and it is going to be a level playing field.
“So I would invite everyone to read the fine print,” he added. “And with Susan and Joe, to reread the fine print.”
I met with Senator Casey and Senator Specter’s chief health care staff person this week. Both of our Senators have been way out front in support of not only the public option in particular but a strong health care reform bill in general.
Senators Specter, Casey and Abortion
The one issue on which there is disagreement is on abortion. Senator Specter has long been pro-choice and will vote against any Stupak-like amendment in the Senate bill.
Senator Casey however has long been pro-life and while he said he hoped to be able to find some mid-point between the language of the Senate bill and the Stupak language, he also said to a room full of advocates for the right to abortion that he would vote for and possibly sponsor an amendment to the Senate bill that included the Stupak language.
We discussed the issue and all of us had to acknowledge that Senator Casey is being true to principles he has long held in taking this stand.
But while we were disappointed with that stand, Senator Casey did say that he does not expect this amendment to be successful and that he would nonetheless vote for health care reform. Reforming health care, he told us, is one of the reasons he wanted to run for the Senate in the first place. And a resolution to the abortion question that is unsatisfactory in eyes is not a reason to vote against legislation that would accomplish so much.
It’s not all we wanted from Senator Casey, but to have a principled opponent of abortion say this will help us move a Conference Committee bill without the Stupak language through not just the Senate but the House.